| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> We acknowledge that our policy may not have been perfect but we need |
| 3 |
> time to analyze claims brought up by/to the QA team to construct a |
| 4 |
> proper proposal for a better policy that would satisfy everyone; |
| 5 |
> hopefully in co-operation with a QA team. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Is there any reason to think that this analysis will come to a |
| 8 |
different conclusion? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I don't see any concerns on the list that weren't addressed already. |
| 11 |
USE=gtk2 means build gtk2 support |
| 12 |
USE=gtk3 means build gtk3 support |
| 13 |
USE="gtk2 gtk3" means build support for whichever version the |
| 14 |
maintainer thinks is better (which is what USE=gtk meant a week ago) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If there is something that has been missed I'm happy to hear it, but |
| 17 |
it has been a week and I haven't seen anything beyond the "why can't |
| 18 |
maintainers choose?" theme which was responded to a week ago. If |
| 19 |
there are other objections we should consider, then please state them |
| 20 |
before the meeting. I'm sure somebody might think of something new, |
| 21 |
but it has been a week and somebody could think of something new 9 |
| 22 |
months from now. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Rich |
Archives