Gentoo Archives: gentoo-python

From: Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>, Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@g.o>, gentoo-python@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] python-distutils.eclass vs. python.eclass + distutils.eclass
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 18:31:19
Message-Id: 4FC12169.9040904@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-python] python-distutils.eclass vs. python.eclass + distutils.eclass by "Michał Górny"
On 26/05/12 12:06, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 11:55:54 +0200 > Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: > >> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> >> wrote: >>> We're planning on splitting some basic 'python' eclass out of it. >>> Just someone needs to do that, or I'll when I'll have more time and >>> a good plan. >> >> Who's we? > > People who talked about it on #gentoo-python a while ago.
For future: if such "decision" is being made care to let rest of the team know? Some people have jobs, families and don't have time to hang out on IRC whole day.
>> >>> We don't support '--newuse' in Gentoo. People who do that are on >>> their own. We have enough problems to care about in our workflow. >> >> Again, who's we? > > Gentoo devs. Mostly base-system ones who add IUSE=static-libs > on a daily basis.
-- Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xF6A80E46 desktop-misc, java, vim, kernel, python, apache...

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies