Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:58:37
Message-Id: BANLkTim9MjjAisp389XihDseWs7f1NRstQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead by "Tomáš Chvátal"
I vote for Barack Obama to lead the QA team

2011/5/24 Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dne 21.5.2011 15:03, Diego Elio Pettenò napsal(a): >> Il giorno sab, 21/05/2011 alle 12.26 +0300, Samuli Suominen ha scritto: >>> In light of recent events, our current lead has proofen he can't >>> control >>> himself in civil manner. It's not a behavior lead should have and >>> tarnishes the reputation for whole team. >> >> Let it be on record that the reputation has been tarnished by QA members >> not following the very policy they are supposed to enforce. >> >> But fine by me, I candiate me and scarabeus. >> > Ok, if you guys want new elections lets do it properly :) > > I propose this timetable: > 27.5. Nominations close - We have the list, new thread is started > 3.6. Voting close - New lead selected > > Voting will happen over this ML where there will be new mail thread > containing names of all candidates to which each developer is supposed > to reply. > > Where QA team size will be determined based on people who bothered to > vote. If a member decide not to vote he will be removed from the QA team > for inactivity (something like mandatory voting). > > And also i accept the nomination. > > Tomas > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk3bxq0ACgkQHB6c3gNBRYdM2QCfeeqmG7CfZRgTS5rblRtk0At3 > wCQAn3jN1L3sg0LE1/8tFuxKXTr5zimW > =ueE4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >