Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:55:52
Message-Id: 4DDBC6AD.90809@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dne 21.5.2011 15:03, Diego Elio Pettenò napsal(a):
> Il giorno sab, 21/05/2011 alle 12.26 +0300, Samuli Suominen ha scritto: >> In light of recent events, our current lead has proofen he can't >> control >> himself in civil manner. It's not a behavior lead should have and >> tarnishes the reputation for whole team. > > Let it be on record that the reputation has been tarnished by QA members > not following the very policy they are supposed to enforce. > > But fine by me, I candiate me and scarabeus. >
Ok, if you guys want new elections lets do it properly :) I propose this timetable: 27.5. Nominations close - We have the list, new thread is started 3.6. Voting close - New lead selected Voting will happen over this ML where there will be new mail thread containing names of all candidates to which each developer is supposed to reply. Where QA team size will be determined based on people who bothered to vote. If a member decide not to vote he will be removed from the QA team for inactivity (something like mandatory voting). And also i accept the nomination. Tomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3bxq0ACgkQHB6c3gNBRYdM2QCfeeqmG7CfZRgTS5rblRtk0At3 wCQAn3jN1L3sg0LE1/8tFuxKXTr5zimW =ueE4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead Christian Ruppert <idl0r@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>