| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Dne 21.5.2011 15:03, Diego Elio Pettenò napsal(a): |
| 5 |
> Il giorno sab, 21/05/2011 alle 12.26 +0300, Samuli Suominen ha scritto: |
| 6 |
>> In light of recent events, our current lead has proofen he can't |
| 7 |
>> control |
| 8 |
>> himself in civil manner. It's not a behavior lead should have and |
| 9 |
>> tarnishes the reputation for whole team. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Let it be on record that the reputation has been tarnished by QA members |
| 12 |
> not following the very policy they are supposed to enforce. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> But fine by me, I candiate me and scarabeus. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
Ok, if you guys want new elections lets do it properly :) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I propose this timetable: |
| 19 |
27.5. Nominations close - We have the list, new thread is started |
| 20 |
3.6. Voting close - New lead selected |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Voting will happen over this ML where there will be new mail thread |
| 23 |
containing names of all candidates to which each developer is supposed |
| 24 |
to reply. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Where QA team size will be determined based on people who bothered to |
| 27 |
vote. If a member decide not to vote he will be removed from the QA team |
| 28 |
for inactivity (something like mandatory voting). |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
And also i accept the nomination. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Tomas |
| 33 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 35 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk3bxq0ACgkQHB6c3gNBRYdM2QCfeeqmG7CfZRgTS5rblRtk0At3 |
| 38 |
wCQAn3jN1L3sg0LE1/8tFuxKXTr5zimW |
| 39 |
=ueE4 |
| 40 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives