Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: Christel Dahlskjaer <christel@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel)
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:46:41
Message-Id: 1157507158.6424.212.camel@gaspode
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel) by Alec Warner
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Torsten Veller wrote: > > * Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>: > >> Torsten Veller wrote: > >>> And we have a new member: christel. > >> Actually according to convention you can't just join a project; you > >> usually need to ask the team and they kind of need to accept you. So my > >> question is, what are your intentions for the QA project Christel? > > > > Would be nice to know, but the QA GLEP says that only current lead > > needs to approve. He did. > > The team selects the lead at any time. > > Actually if you review the alias she voted for him, so how was she > approved prior to him being lead; if we had no lead prior to spb?
Nopes. I think you will find that with qa as many other alias a lot of non team members are on the alias out of curiousity. qa@g.o currently has 26 developers on it, not all of which are part of the QA team.
> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her; > where is the mail saying so? I'd prefer more transparency than just the > lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team. > God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd > get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at > finding me magically added.
-- gentoo-qa@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel) Christel Dahlskjaer <christel@g.o>