1 |
Ballerina Benni and releng, |
2 |
|
3 |
I would have absolutely no problem making releng +m. On another note, |
4 |
during releases, I would even think #-releng should go +i, so that dev's |
5 |
can get stuff done. As you can see, I changed the topic to something |
6 |
different in there because users were coming in bugging that they wanted |
7 |
2004.2. During non-release periods, having it -mi helps with users |
8 |
coming in with specific livecd questions, some things have been solved |
9 |
that way. But during release periods, I need to know that I can say "hey |
10 |
guys, i'm pushing 2004.2 out" and I dont have users crawling up my ass |
11 |
asking "is it ready? is it ready? can i test?" I believe zhen is the |
12 |
owner of the channel if my chanserv memory serves me correctly. If he |
13 |
wants to delegate op-giving permissions to a couple guys, I would |
14 |
happily bear that responsibility. |
15 |
|
16 |
my 2 cents, |
17 |
jeffrey |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 06:35, Benjamin Judas wrote: |
21 |
> Hi again |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I was a bit p*ssed off when I wrote the mail (see the grammar mistakes). |
24 |
> I didn't want to get personal, but my opinion remains. I don't want to |
25 |
> lock out users, but I also don't like to be disturbed at really |
26 |
> important conversations. We already had one release going down the drain |
27 |
> because of bad communication. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> ghettobp, if you can read this: I am sorry for being unfriendly in the |
30 |
> channel and in my original mail a few minutes ago. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Sorry again |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Benni |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Am Sa, den 24.07.2004 schrieb Benjamin Judas um 12:44: |
37 |
> > Hi folks, |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> > as you all maybe have noticed, a lot of users joined #gentoo-releng over |
40 |
> > the last week. Some of them just had little questions and left |
41 |
> > afterwards, some stay there and providing "intelligent" comments and |
42 |
> > thus are disturbing for serious conversations in there. The most |
43 |
> > remarkable thing was when chris, john, jeff, roger and me were talking |
44 |
> > about the coordination of mirror-propagation and some user (I think it |
45 |
> > was ghettobp19) constantly enlightened us with their point of view. |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> > So the question is: how should we handle that? Change channel-mode to |
48 |
> > +m, set the channel to invite only or leave it like it is and live with |
49 |
> > all these zealots? |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > Regards, |
52 |
-- |
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
-------------------- |
56 |
Jeffrey Forman |
57 |
Gentoo Infrastructure |
58 |
Gentoo Release Engin. |
59 |
jforman@g.o |
60 |
-------------------- |