1 |
Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
2 |
> Kamil Górnik wrote: |
3 |
>> Hi, |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> I suffer lack of vi (vim) on stage3 since ever. It's not a big binary |
6 |
>> and still there are those who prefer vi to nano. |
7 |
>> Every time I install gentoo the first time I need to do after setting |
8 |
>> up the system is emerging vi before emerge -Du world. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> We will *never* include vim instead of nano, simple because |
11 |
> *everybody* can use nano, which many people have no fscking clue how |
12 |
> to use vim. I've been a linux user for almost 8 years, and I've never |
13 |
> learned how to use vim. We also will not include *both* packages, |
14 |
> because that would bloat the stages unnecessarily. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Just because you prefer vim instead of nano doesn't mean we should use |
17 |
> it. There are many aspects of the release where somebody thinks that |
18 |
> *their* preference is the correct one. It usually isn't :P |
19 |
> |
20 |
I've heard this numerous times. And Andrew is correct in that stage 3 |
21 |
should not ever include vim. That said, how about a static version of |
22 |
vim that could hang out somewhere and be brought down and used quite |
23 |
easily. I'll leave it to ya'll to figure that one out. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- |
27 |
Scanned with Copfilter Version 0.84beta3a (ProxSMTP 1.6) |
28 |
AntiVirus: ClamAV 0.91.2/5562 - Sat Jan 26 05:34:23 2008 |
29 |
by Markus Madlener @ http://www.copfilter.org |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-releng@l.g.o mailing list |