Gentoo Archives: gentoo-releng

From: Brent Baude <ranger@g.o>
To: gentoo-releng@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Call for feature request for 2008.0
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:13:04
Message-Id: 479BBE7E.80806@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-releng] Call for feature request for 2008.0 by Andrew Gaffney
1 Andrew Gaffney wrote:
2 > Kamil Górnik wrote:
3 >> Hi,
4 >>
5 >> I suffer lack of vi (vim) on stage3 since ever. It's not a big binary
6 >> and still there are those who prefer vi to nano.
7 >> Every time I install gentoo the first time I need to do after setting
8 >> up the system is emerging vi before emerge -Du world.
9 >
10 > We will *never* include vim instead of nano, simple because
11 > *everybody* can use nano, which many people have no fscking clue how
12 > to use vim. I've been a linux user for almost 8 years, and I've never
13 > learned how to use vim. We also will not include *both* packages,
14 > because that would bloat the stages unnecessarily.
15 >
16 > Just because you prefer vim instead of nano doesn't mean we should use
17 > it. There are many aspects of the release where somebody thinks that
18 > *their* preference is the correct one. It usually isn't :P
19 >
20 I've heard this numerous times. And Andrew is correct in that stage 3
21 should not ever include vim. That said, how about a static version of
22 vim that could hang out somewhere and be brought down and used quite
23 easily. I'll leave it to ya'll to figure that one out.
24
25
26 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
27 Scanned with Copfilter Version 0.84beta3a (ProxSMTP 1.6)
28 AntiVirus: ClamAV 0.91.2/5562 - Sat Jan 26 05:34:23 2008
29 by Markus Madlener @ http://www.copfilter.org
30 --
31 gentoo-releng@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-releng] Call for feature request for 2008.0 Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-releng] Call for feature request for 2008.0 Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>