1 |
Hi Marcus. |
2 |
|
3 |
Thanks for picking this up! |
4 |
I did not realise we did not have kpl, gun/labplot and others under some sci |
5 |
category yet, so I think this would be nice to do indeed. |
6 |
Just one suggestion: |
7 |
all the sci-* categories are in fact full words and not shorthands, so it |
8 |
would make sense to make this a full word too. Something like |
9 |
sci-visualization or sci-plot. |
10 |
|
11 |
Oh, another one. When you submit the proposal to -dev it will be nice to |
12 |
include an estimate of how many other plotting/graphing packages we have |
13 |
lined up in bugzilla. Not that it makes it any stronger with the list of 16 |
14 |
already in portage :), but still is nice to have.. |
15 |
|
16 |
George |
17 |
|
18 |
On Sunday, 27. November 2005 21.53, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: |
19 |
> Hi, |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I would like to propose the addition of a new category - sci-vis. The |
22 |
> category is intended for scientific visualisation tools. Many of these are |
23 |
> currently in media-gfx and I don't think they belong with photo editors, |
24 |
> image conversion tools etc. The category is quite big already and most of |
25 |
> the ebuilds in there are maintained by quite different herds. |
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |