| 1 |
C Y wrote: |
| 2 |
> OK, I checked my system. I'm using guile 1.8.1-r3, but I had to compile |
| 3 |
> with the "depreciated" flag set in order to support TeXmacs. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Just re-confirmed - with that configuration, TeXmacs builds successfully. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Cheers, |
| 8 |
> CY |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Andrey G. Grozin wrote: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> On Fri, 4 May 2007, C Y wrote: |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>>> Which flags did you compile guile with? I think there needs to be one |
| 15 |
>>> active about supporting some kind of older functionality, but the |
| 16 |
>>> details escape me now. I had build failures until I fixed that - I'll |
| 17 |
>>> check tonight and see which one it was. The TeXmacs ebuild really |
| 18 |
>>> should check for it. |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>> The latest stable guile in the portage tree is 1.6.7. TeXmacs compiles |
| 21 |
>> fine with it. When guile-1.8.* will become stable, we'll have to do |
| 22 |
>> something with the TeXmacs ebuild. But, maybe, TeXmacs will be usable |
| 23 |
>> with 1.8 before that (?) |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> Andrey |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
Has that been pushed upstream to the TeXmacs team? |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |
Archives