Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: C Y <smustudent1@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] TeXmacs-1.0.6.9-r1 compile problems
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 01:00:30
Message-Id: 463BD6F1.5010404@yahoo.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] TeXmacs-1.0.6.9-r1 compile problems by "Andrey G. Grozin"
1 OK, I checked my system. I'm using guile 1.8.1-r3, but I had to compile
2 with the "depreciated" flag set in order to support TeXmacs.
3
4 Just re-confirmed - with that configuration, TeXmacs builds successfully.
5
6 Cheers,
7 CY
8
9 Andrey G. Grozin wrote:
10 > On Fri, 4 May 2007, C Y wrote:
11 >> Which flags did you compile guile with? I think there needs to be one
12 >> active about supporting some kind of older functionality, but the
13 >> details escape me now. I had build failures until I fixed that - I'll
14 >> check tonight and see which one it was. The TeXmacs ebuild really
15 >> should check for it.
16 > The latest stable guile in the portage tree is 1.6.7. TeXmacs compiles
17 > fine with it. When guile-1.8.* will become stable, we'll have to do
18 > something with the TeXmacs ebuild. But, maybe, TeXmacs will be usable
19 > with 1.8 before that (?)
20 >
21 > Andrey
22
23 --
24 gentoo-science@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] TeXmacs-1.0.6.9-r1 compile problems "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@×××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-science] TeXmacs-1.0.6.9-r1 compile problems Frank Hellmuth <fhellmut@×××××××××××××××××××.de>