Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Markus Dittrich <markusle@g.o>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] status of lapack install
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:01:20
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.64.0703192051060.4625@woodpecker.gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-science] status of lapack install by "de Almeida
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
5 >
6 > Hello,
7 > Calculating dependencies... done!
8 > [ebuild N ] sci-libs/lapack-config-1.0.1 0 kB
9 > [ebuild N ] sci-libs/blas-atlas-3.7.11 USE="doc -debug" 1,991 kB
10 > [ebuild N ] sci-libs/lapack-reference-3.0-r1 USE="-debug -ifc"
11 > 4,935 kB
12 >
13
14 The currently stable lapack-atlas and blas-atlas (3.7.11) compile
15 fine with gcc-4.x.
16 Should you go with lapack-reference you will need the most
17 recent lapack-reference-3.1.1 not lapack-reference-3.0-r1.
18 The reference ebuilds (both lapack and blas) take less time
19 to compile but provide less optimized routines. Hence, you have
20 to decide what is more important to you.
21
22 cheers,
23 Markus
24
25
26 - --
27 Markus Dittrich (markusle)
28 Gentoo Linux Developer
29 Scientific applications
30 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
32
33 iD8DBQFF/vnVxlRwCwb7k40RAs+dAJ0RRCkPvaDrM7Mq9fS0Iw+hrUddqACeJg7z
34 YcfVtOwjkn+t4mBHZRfnBrM=
35 =5Zd7
36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
37 --
38 gentoo-science@g.o mailing list

Replies