| 1 |
Henry Gebhardt wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Justin <justin@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Justin schrieb: |
| 4 |
>>> Henry Gebhardt schrieb: |
| 5 |
>>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Justin <justin@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>>> Henry Gebhardt schrieb: |
| 7 |
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Justin <justin@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>>>>> Justin schrieb: |
| 9 |
>>>>>> (...) |
| 10 |
>>>>>>> But I hit some bad thing, I am working alot with branches and noted that |
| 11 |
>>>>>>> the .git dir growths and growths, although I removed the branches. Can |
| 12 |
>>>>>>> I clean this up? |
| 13 |
>>>>>> Yes! Collect all the garbage with |
| 14 |
>>>>>> |
| 15 |
>>>>>> $ git gc |
| 16 |
>>>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>>>> ~Henry |
| 18 |
>>>>>> |
| 19 |
>>>>> but that doesn't really shrink the size. |
| 20 |
>>>> That's weird. How big is it getting? (Mine is 4.1 MB) |
| 21 |
>>>> |
| 22 |
>>> 150mb adn it shrinked with git gc --agressive down to 120mb. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Now that is indeed a bit excessive. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
>>> What I did was pulling other overlays as branch, doing an filterbranch |
| 27 |
>>> and only merging certain thing. perhaps this is something different than |
| 28 |
>>> branching the repo itself. |
| 29 |
>>> |
| 30 |
>> and of course deleted the branches afterwards |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Hm, I've never used git filter-branch before, but according to the |
| 34 |
> manpage the original branches are still stored in .git/refs/original, |
| 35 |
> so git gc wouldn't remove the objects they reference. Also, there |
| 36 |
> might still be a reference in .git/refs/remotes. (Possibly |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> $ git branch -a |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> will show all of them to you (definitely the remote ones).) |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> Hope that helps. |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> ~Henry |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
yeah I deleted all branches, in branch -a there is only the local master |
| 48 |
and the the origin/master. |
Archives