1 |
Who gives a shit if a script kiddie gets his box |
2 |
rebooted for doing something he shouldnt be doing in |
3 |
the first place. This looks like an active defense, |
4 |
and I would definitely like to see the results if you |
5 |
finish your project brian! |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
--- ascii <ascii@××××××××.com> wrote: |
9 |
|
10 |
> Brian Micek wrote: |
11 |
> > Please lets forget about this thread because its |
12 |
> going nowhere and once |
13 |
> > again, I apologize about all this spam. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> yeah, i love BOFH : ) but the argue about cpu and |
16 |
> bandwith waste is real |
17 |
> |
18 |
> don't care who say you can't send random data on |
19 |
> request, we are free to |
20 |
> reply what we want on a request (also some ascii |
21 |
> p*rn is a good idea) |
22 |
> |
23 |
> if you are using tcpd consider to do something like |
24 |
> catting some random |
25 |
> data to a file and then stream the file (no disk i/o |
26 |
> since linux has |
27 |
> caching, low cpu usage) |
28 |
> |
29 |
> remember also you are sending some of your precious |
30 |
> *true* random data |
31 |
> to the bad guy (i'm not able to exploit or predict |
32 |
> the next random bit |
33 |
> but i heard somebody on the globe is able to.. so be |
34 |
> paranoid :P ) |
35 |
> |
36 |
> also the client will break the tcp stream on X null |
37 |
> chars or something |
38 |
> like that so use a file and close the connection at |
39 |
> some poit is good |
40 |
> to prevent bandwith waste (don't let the client |
41 |
> decide) |
42 |
> |
43 |
> an other thing to consider is ip spoofing, but who |
44 |
> cares : ) |
45 |
> |
46 |
> just my 901 bytes opinion.. |
47 |
> -- |
48 |
> gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
49 |
> |
50 |
> |
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
__________________________________ |
57 |
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 |
58 |
http://mail.yahoo.com |
59 |
-- |
60 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |