Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Ben Munat <bent@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] udev conflict
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 18:08:36
Message-Id: 44983859.4050705@munat.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] udev conflict by Patrick Lauer
1 Thanks for the reply. Do you (or anyone else) know for sure that udev is absolutely not
2 used by a 2.4 kernel?
3
4 It seems like I read this somewhere, but I haven't been sure enough to simply uninstall
5 it. This machine is about 1000 miles away from me, serves about a dozen live sites, and
6 handles email for dozens of people (including myself), so I definitely don't want to make
7 it unbootable! :-)
8
9 b
10
11 Patrick Lauer wrote:
12 > On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:30 -0700, Ben Munat wrote:
13 >
14 >>No one had any ideas on this? I can't emerge -uD world... :-(
15 >
16 > emerge unmerge udev && emerge -upD world ?
17 >
18 > looks like udev shouldn't be there, but portage is too "dumb" to realize
19 > that it should block ...
20 >
21 > Patrick
22 >
23 >
24 >
25 >>Ben Munat wrote:
26 >>
27 >>>When I do "emerge -puD world" on my server (running kernel 2.4.31), I
28 >>>get the output below. I understand that this means that portage is
29 >>>trying to emerge udev and can't find anything that's not masked. But I
30 >>>don't understand why.
31 >>>
32 >>>I have udev 087 installed, which according to packages.gentoo.org is the
33 >>>most recent "+" version of udev.
34 >>>
35 >>>According to "equery depends udev", the only thing that depends on udev
36 >>>is baselayout and I have baselayout-1.11.14-r8 installed, which is the
37 >>>only "+" version of baselayout according to packages.gentoo.org.
38 >>>
39 >>>I also don't have anything in any of the /etc/portage files about
40 >>>baselayout or udev. However, I am using a 2.4 profile:
41 >>>
42 >>>/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/no-nptl/2.4/
43 >>>
44 >>>And, hey this is odd... sys-fs/udev should be masked according to the
45 >>>package.mask in that profile... So, how is it that I even have it
46 >>>installed? Yeah, isn't a 2.4 kernel supposed to be using devfsd still?
47 >>>Do I somehow have the wrong version of baselayout installed?
48 >>>
49 >>>Well, any insights on this much appreciated!
50 >>>
51 >>>Ben
52 >>>
53 >>>
54 >>>Output of "emerge -puD world":
55 >>>
56 >>>These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
57 >>>
58 >>>Calculating world dependencies ..
59 >>>!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-fs/udev-070" have been masked.
60 >>>!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
61 >>>request:
62 >>>- sys-fs/udev-079-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
63 >>># Gustavo Zacarias <gustavoz@g.o>
64 >>># New toys enabled by 2.6 headers
65 >>>
66 >>>- sys-fs/udev-089 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
67 >>>- sys-fs/udev-086 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
68 >>>- sys-fs/udev-087 (masked by: package.mask)
69 >>>- sys-fs/udev-084 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
70 >>>- sys-fs/udev-085 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
71 >>>- sys-fs/udev-081 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
72 >>>- sys-fs/udev-089-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
73 >>>- sys-fs/udev-089-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
74 >>>- sys-fs/udev-070-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
75 >>>- sys-fs/udev-081-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
76 >>>- sys-fs/udev-077-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
77 >>>- sys-fs/udev-077-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
78 >>>- sys-fs/udev-077-r3 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
79 >>>- sys-fs/udev-077-r4 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
80 >>>- sys-fs/udev-077-r5 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
81 >>>- sys-fs/udev-090 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
82 >>>- sys-fs/udev-073 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
83 >>>- sys-fs/udev-072 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
84 >>>- sys-fs/udev-071 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
85 >>>- sys-fs/udev-077 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
86 >>>- sys-fs/udev-079 (masked by: package.mask)
87 >>>- sys-fs/udev-078 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
88 >>>
89 >>>For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
90 >>>refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
91 >>>(dependency required by "sys-apps/baselayout-1.11.14-r8" [ebuild])
92 >>>
93 >>>
94 >>>
95 >>>!!! Problem resolving dependencies for sys-apps/baselayout
96 >>>!!! Depgraph creation failed.
97 >>>
98 >>>
99 --
100 gentoo-server@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] udev conflict Thien Vu <thien.vu@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-server] udev conflict Jeremy Brake <gentoolists@×××××××××××.nz>
Re: [gentoo-server] udev conflict Karl Zander <gentoolist@××××××××××××.com>