Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Karl Zander <gentoolist@××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] udev conflict
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:08:31
Message-Id: web-3030920@commpartners.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] udev conflict by Ben Munat
1 Ben,
2
3 Take a look at this thread from the forums. Seems
4 similiar to what you have.
5
6 http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-471358-highlight-udev070.html
7
8
9 --Karl
10
11
12 On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:03:05 -0700
13 Ben Munat <bent@×××××.com> wrote:
14 > Thanks for the reply. Do you (or anyone else) know for
15 >sure that udev is absolutely not used by a 2.4 kernel?
16 >
17 > It seems like I read this somewhere, but I haven't been
18 >sure enough to simply uninstall it. This machine is about
19 >1000 miles away from me, serves about a dozen live sites,
20 >and handles email for dozens of people (including
21 >myself), so I definitely don't want to make it
22 >unbootable! :-)
23 >
24 > b
25 >
26 > Patrick Lauer wrote:
27 >> On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:30 -0700, Ben Munat wrote:
28 >>
29 >>>No one had any ideas on this? I can't emerge -uD world...
30 >>>:-(
31 >>
32 >> emerge unmerge udev && emerge -upD world ?
33 >>
34 >> looks like udev shouldn't be there, but portage is too
35 >>"dumb" to realize
36 >> that it should block ...
37 >>
38 >> Patrick
39 >>
40 >>
41 >>
42 >>>Ben Munat wrote:
43 >>>
44 >>>>When I do "emerge -puD world" on my server (running
45 >>>>kernel 2.4.31), I get the output below. I understand that
46 >>>>this means that portage is trying to emerge udev and
47 >>>>can't find anything that's not masked. But I don't
48 >>>>understand why.
49 >>>>
50 >>>>I have udev 087 installed, which according to
51 >>>>packages.gentoo.org is the most recent "+" version of
52 >>>>udev.
53 >>>>
54 >>>>According to "equery depends udev", the only thing that
55 >>>>depends on udev is baselayout and I have
56 >>>>baselayout-1.11.14-r8 installed, which is the only "+"
57 >>>>version of baselayout according to packages.gentoo.org.
58 >>>>
59 >>>>I also don't have anything in any of the /etc/portage
60 >>>>files about baselayout or udev. However, I am using a 2.4
61 >>>>profile:
62 >>>>
63 >>>>/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/no-nptl/2.4/
64 >>>>
65 >>>>And, hey this is odd... sys-fs/udev should be masked
66 >>>>according to the package.mask in that profile... So, how
67 >>>>is it that I even have it installed? Yeah, isn't a 2.4
68 >>>>kernel supposed to be using devfsd still? Do I somehow
69 >>>>have the wrong version of baselayout installed?
70 >>>>
71 >>>>Well, any insights on this much appreciated!
72 >>>>
73 >>>>Ben
74 >>>>
75 >>>>
76 >>>>Output of "emerge -puD world":
77 >>>>
78 >>>>These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
79 >>>>
80 >>>>Calculating world dependencies ..
81 >>>>!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-fs/udev-070"
82 >>>>have been masked.
83 >>>>!!! One of the following masked packages is required to
84 >>>>complete your request:
85 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-079-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
86 >>>># Gustavo Zacarias <gustavoz@g.o>
87 >>>># New toys enabled by 2.6 headers
88 >>>>
89 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-089 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
90 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-086 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
91 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-087 (masked by: package.mask)
92 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-084 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
93 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-085 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
94 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-081 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
95 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-089-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86
96 >>>>keyword)
97 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-089-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86
98 >>>>keyword)
99 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-070-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
100 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-081-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86
101 >>>>keyword)
102 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-077-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86
103 >>>>keyword)
104 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-077-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86
105 >>>>keyword)
106 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-077-r3 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86
107 >>>>keyword)
108 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-077-r4 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86
109 >>>>keyword)
110 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-077-r5 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86
111 >>>>keyword)
112 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-090 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
113 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-073 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
114 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-072 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
115 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-071 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
116 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-077 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
117 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-079 (masked by: package.mask)
118 >>>>- sys-fs/udev-078 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
119 >>>>
120 >>>>For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the
121 >>>>emerge man page or
122 >>>>refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
123 >>>>(dependency required by "sys-apps/baselayout-1.11.14-r8"
124 >>>>[ebuild])
125 >>>>
126 >>>>
127 >>>>
128 >>>>!!! Problem resolving dependencies for
129 >>>>sys-apps/baselayout
130 >>>>!!! Depgraph creation failed.
131 >>>>
132 >>>>
133 > --
134 > gentoo-server@g.o mailing list
135 >
136
137
138 --
139 gentoo-server@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] udev conflict Ben Munat <bent@×××××.com>