Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Ben Munat <bent@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] udev conflict
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:09:22
Message-Id: 4498F061.7030709@munat.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] udev conflict by Karl Zander
1 Thanks for the replies everyone! Went ahead and unmerged udev and everything seems to be fine.
2
3 b
4
5 Karl Zander wrote:
6 > Ben,
7 >
8 > Take a look at this thread from the forums. Seems similiar to what you
9 > have.
10 >
11 > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-471358-highlight-udev070.html
12 >
13 >
14 > --Karl
15 >
16 >
17 > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:03:05 -0700
18 > Ben Munat <bent@×××××.com> wrote:
19 >
20 >> Thanks for the reply. Do you (or anyone else) know for sure that udev
21 >> is absolutely not used by a 2.4 kernel?
22 >>
23 >> It seems like I read this somewhere, but I haven't been sure enough to
24 >> simply uninstall it. This machine is about 1000 miles away from me,
25 >> serves about a dozen live sites, and handles email for dozens of
26 >> people (including myself), so I definitely don't want to make it
27 >> unbootable! :-)
28 >>
29 >> b
30 >>
31 >> Patrick Lauer wrote:
32 >>
33 >>> On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:30 -0700, Ben Munat wrote:
34 >>>
35 >>>> No one had any ideas on this? I can't emerge -uD world... :-(
36 >>>
37 >>>
38 >>> emerge unmerge udev && emerge -upD world ?
39 >>>
40 >>> looks like udev shouldn't be there, but portage is too "dumb" to realize
41 >>> that it should block ...
42 >>>
43 >>> Patrick
44 >>>
45 >>>
46 >>>
47 >>>> Ben Munat wrote:
48 >>>>
49 >>>>> When I do "emerge -puD world" on my server (running kernel 2.4.31),
50 >>>>> I get the output below. I understand that this means that portage
51 >>>>> is trying to emerge udev and can't find anything that's not masked.
52 >>>>> But I don't understand why.
53 >>>>>
54 >>>>> I have udev 087 installed, which according to packages.gentoo.org
55 >>>>> is the most recent "+" version of udev.
56 >>>>>
57 >>>>> According to "equery depends udev", the only thing that depends on
58 >>>>> udev is baselayout and I have baselayout-1.11.14-r8 installed,
59 >>>>> which is the only "+" version of baselayout according to
60 >>>>> packages.gentoo.org.
61 >>>>>
62 >>>>> I also don't have anything in any of the /etc/portage files about
63 >>>>> baselayout or udev. However, I am using a 2.4 profile:
64 >>>>>
65 >>>>> /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/no-nptl/2.4/
66 >>>>>
67 >>>>> And, hey this is odd... sys-fs/udev should be masked according to
68 >>>>> the package.mask in that profile... So, how is it that I even have
69 >>>>> it installed? Yeah, isn't a 2.4 kernel supposed to be using devfsd
70 >>>>> still? Do I somehow have the wrong version of baselayout installed?
71 >>>>>
72 >>>>> Well, any insights on this much appreciated!
73 >>>>>
74 >>>>> Ben
75 >>>>>
76 >>>>>
77 >>>>> Output of "emerge -puD world":
78 >>>>>
79 >>>>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
80 >>>>>
81 >>>>> Calculating world dependencies ..
82 >>>>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-fs/udev-070" have been
83 >>>>> masked.
84 >>>>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete
85 >>>>> your request:
86 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-079-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
87 >>>>> # Gustavo Zacarias <gustavoz@g.o>
88 >>>>> # New toys enabled by 2.6 headers
89 >>>>>
90 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-089 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
91 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-086 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
92 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-087 (masked by: package.mask)
93 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-084 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
94 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-085 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
95 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-081 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
96 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-089-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
97 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-089-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
98 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-070-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
99 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-081-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
100 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-077-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
101 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-077-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
102 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-077-r3 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
103 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-077-r4 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
104 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-077-r5 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
105 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-090 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
106 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-073 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
107 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-072 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
108 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-071 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
109 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-077 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
110 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-079 (masked by: package.mask)
111 >>>>> - sys-fs/udev-078 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
112 >>>>>
113 >>>>> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man
114 >>>>> page or
115 >>>>> refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
116 >>>>> (dependency required by "sys-apps/baselayout-1.11.14-r8" [ebuild])
117 >>>>>
118 >>>>>
119 >>>>>
120 >>>>> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for sys-apps/baselayout
121 >>>>> !!! Depgraph creation failed.
122 >>>>>
123 >>>>>
124 >> --
125 >> gentoo-server@g.o mailing list
126 >>
127 >
128 >
129 --
130 gentoo-server@g.o mailing list