Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Sean Cook <scook@×××××.net>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Was it necessary to remove support?
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:48:38
Message-Id: 43D12F4C.5040605@kinex.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-server] Was it necessary to remove support? by Andrew Kesterson
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 The stage1 instructions have been moved to the FAQ... it is still
5 supported and documented... just not in the handbook.
6
7 Sean
8
9 Andrew Kesterson wrote:
10 >
11 > This is going to sound a bit elitist, but was it really necessary to
12 > remove install instructions for a stage 1/2 from the handbook? It seems
13 > to me like, if someone doesn't know what they're doing when they start a
14 > stage 1, then they should not be surprised when they bork the install.
15 > Besides, it's all very plainly laid out; or at least it was.
16 >
17 > Hope I don't forget how to do it the next time I setup a
18 > workstation. :-P Is there at least going to be a FAQ for how to
19 > recompile a working server from the base system with custom CFLAGS and
20 > USE flags, for those who haven't done a stage 1 before?
21 >
22 > Cheers.
23 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
24 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
25 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
26
27 iD8DBQFD0S9My9wPyZpnL2URAthnAKCNJldjSpMRygN94akbVsPimwfWPwCdHVFo
28 B+O1S2CTRzDz5R24kSPCwCI=
29 =7sJY
30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 --
32 gentoo-server@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] Was it necessary to remove support? Andrew Kesterson <andrew@××××××.net>