| 1 |
Not so sure how accurate it is, but you can try this one I got via |
| 2 |
osnews.com: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
http://linuxgazette.net/102/piszcz.html |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Remember that benchmarking is evil by nature. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-Dormando |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Anthony Gorecki wrote: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> On Monday 20 September 2004 9:20 am, davin@××××××××××××××.net wrote: |
| 13 |
> > Reiserfs3 is great for large volume of small files but why aren't you |
| 14 |
> > checking out ReiserFS4? XFS and RFS4 run very close in performance. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I've been searching Google for a number of weeks trying to find a thorough |
| 17 |
> benchmark involving RFS4, XFS and EXT2/3. Does anyone have a link to one? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> Anthony Gorecki |
| 22 |
> Ectro-Linux Foundation |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
Archives