From: | Anthony Gorecki <anthony@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-server@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-server] For a 1.5TB server running Samba and NFS ONLY,what's the best kernel? | ||
Date: | Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:58:42 | ||
Message-Id: | 200409201457.18776.anthony@ectrolinux.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-server] For a 1.5TB server running Samba and NFS ONLY,what's the best kernel? by davin@kiwiconsulting.net |
1 | On Monday 20 September 2004 9:20 am, davin@××××××××××××××.net wrote: |
2 | > Reiserfs3 is great for large volume of small files but why aren't you |
3 | > checking out ReiserFS4? XFS and RFS4 run very close in performance. |
4 | |
5 | I've been searching Google for a number of weeks trying to find a thorough |
6 | benchmark involving RFS4, XFS and EXT2/3. Does anyone have a link to one? |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | -- |
10 | Anthony Gorecki |
11 | Ectro-Linux Foundation |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-server] For a 1.5TB server running Samba and NFS ONLY,what's the best kernel? | Dormando <dormando@×××××.net> |
Re: [gentoo-server] For a 1.5TB server running Samba and NFS ONLY,what's the best kernel? | Rob Baxter <burn@××××××.ca> |