Archives
Archives
| From: | Eric Sammer <esammer@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-server@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-server] Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree | ||
| Date: | Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:23:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 402B5433.4030109@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-server] Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree by Torsten Veller |
||
| 1 | Torsten Veller wrote: |
| 2 | > What about signed packages? I want to be sure that the PORTDIR stuff |
| 3 | > wasn't changed on the way to me (or my server). |
| 4 | |
| 5 | While a good suggestion, that's a planned feature of portage, separate |
| 6 | from a frozen tree. I am not sure of when this will be integrated but I |
| 7 | know it's On The List(tm). |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Regards. |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Eric Sammer |
| 12 | Gentoo Linux |
| 13 | http://www.gentoo.org |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |