Archives
Archives
| From: | Torsten Veller <ml-en@××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-server@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-server] Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree | ||
| Date: | Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:29:46 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20040212100141.GAed0bc.tv@veller.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-server] requirements for a more stable portage tree by Kurt Lieber |
||
| 1 | * Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o>: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > And...what else? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | What about signed packages? I want to be sure that the PORTDIR stuff |
| 6 | wasn't changed on the way to me (or my server). |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | .: Torsten | The universe is all a spin-off of the Big Bang. :. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-server] Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree | Eric Sammer <esammer@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-server] Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree | Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o> |