| 1 |
Am Mittwoch 16 August 2006 11:36 schrieb Craig Webster: |
| 2 |
> On 16 Aug 2006, at 10:19, Jan Meier wrote: |
| 3 |
> > No, I do not need the latest version. But I do not want to do "some |
| 4 |
> > security |
| 5 |
> > patching", I want to have every security risk patched (updated), |
| 6 |
> > without |
| 7 |
> > updating all the dependencies. That's the point. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > For example emerge -u imagemagick shows a really long list for |
| 10 |
> > updating, I do |
| 11 |
> > not think that all of them are really needed. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Have you tried using glsa-check? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I am using glsa-check for reporting vulnerable software, currently not for |
| 16 |
updating. |
| 17 |
I will give "emerge imagemagick" a shot, maybe that has less dependencies :). |
| 18 |
With your answeres in mind I came to the opinion that there is not a real |
| 19 |
need for a "stable portage tree". |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Jan |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> Cheers, |
| 26 |
> Craig |
| 27 |
> -- |
| 28 |
> No long-term contracts, no complicated signup forms, no hidden costs. |
| 29 |
> Xeriom 2.0: Web hosting made easy. Coming soon! http://xeriom.net/ |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Archives