1 |
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 11:36 -0500, James M. Cook wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 22 December 2005 8:41 am, Ow Mun Heng wrote: |
3 |
> > Hi All, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Just want to see if anyone has any good info to share. |
6 |
|
7 |
> I've evaluated all the packages you've listed but had completely forgotten |
8 |
> about ntop (which I'm playing with now, fantastic). |
9 |
|
10 |
With some additional overhead. There is a perl script to export the data |
11 |
to SQL but I've yet to play with it. (but the downside is that it's not |
12 |
supported and thus, I may be knocking on a dead door when I see trouble) |
13 |
|
14 |
> I'm not sure any of them |
15 |
> are going to give you what you want. |
16 |
|
17 |
Can't have my cake and eat it too? :-( |
18 |
|
19 |
> I didn't see any information about Traffic Flow Analysis on argus' website, do |
20 |
> you have that URL? |
21 |
|
22 |
It should be on argus' website. I'm sure it's not a figment of my |
23 |
imagination. |
24 |
|
25 |
> opennms - nice, but uses tomcat since it's java based. Seemed to generate the |
26 |
> heaviest load on the server. Not knowing a whole lot about tomcat and using |
27 |
> tomcat4, which is not available in portage, made setup a little tricky for |
28 |
> me. Didn't see any graphing capabilities either. |
29 |
|
30 |
You actually installed it? I know of one company exinda (IIRC) that uses |
31 |
java for it's traffic analysis. Not only is it slow, it's also unable to |
32 |
do the stuffs I want. |
33 |
|
34 |
> jffnms - this was my choice for a while. Then I tried to add a new OID and |
35 |
> couldn't figure it out. I found the montoring interface was good but |
36 |
|
37 |
Based on list archives, it used to be in portage, but it was taken out. |
38 |
|
39 |
> |
40 |
> argus - this is my new choice. I like the simple web interface and the |
41 |
> configuration is pretty straightforward. I'm actually creating a script to |
42 |
> convert my old monitoring sw config to argus. Working at an ASP requires |
43 |
> monitoring website performance which appears to be the most straightforward |
44 |
> with argus. The graphs aren't as good as some other packages. |
45 |
|
46 |
Again, argus doesn't support putting data into a SQL table. |
47 |
|
48 |
> zabbix - midas - cacti with the threshold plugin. |
49 |
|
50 |
I tried cacti before, but since I wasn't able to get SNMP to work with |
51 |
my NIC (I tried it out on a laptop) I just gave up. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> It seems to me that none of these packages are perfect fits. |
54 |
|
55 |
Ditto |
56 |
|
57 |
> My main issue is there is not web interface to |
58 |
> update the config which is available in most of the others. This should only |
59 |
> become an issue when I start to have others maintain the system. :) |
60 |
|
61 |
That's why there's those 4am calls for manual intervention. |
62 |
|
63 |
I'll be frank, what I want is for a way to determine top talkers and |
64 |
then use that data (with the IP) and then use TC (traffic control) rules |
65 |
to restrict/handicap it's bandwidth. Right now, what I'm doing is manual |
66 |
control and I can't keep up with the 4am nights just to restrict some |
67 |
IPs. |
68 |
|
69 |
Do you have any comment/info on how/what's best to do those? Do you also |
70 |
know if the way ntop stores it's data, does it also store the IP |
71 |
addreses in the RRD Database as well? What I need is to just get the top |
72 |
talkers and that would be great. Whipping up a perl/shell script via |
73 |
cron to do the dirty work for me. |
74 |
|
75 |
Thanks |
76 |
|
77 |
-- |
78 |
Ow Mun Heng |
79 |
Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 1.5GB RAM |
80 |
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!! |
81 |
Neuromancer 10:12:28 up 1 day, 54 min, 4 users, load average: 1.15, |
82 |
0.77, 1.66 |
83 |
|
84 |
|
85 |
-- |
86 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |