| 1 |
On Friday 23 September 2005 03:03, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 22 September 2005 18:27, Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Well, the problem right now is what kind of a route do we want to take? |
| 4 |
> > For example, if Gentoo wanted to try and maintain an enterprise ready |
| 5 |
> > solution to the stable tree issue, I don't think we could do it. On the |
| 6 |
> > other hand, if we wanted to establish a few tools/solutions that provide |
| 7 |
> > some enterprise ready functionality, I think we may be able to do that. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Unfortunately I think you're right. While I would like to contribute to the |
| 10 |
> maintainance of a stable Portage tree, it is definately beyond what a |
| 11 |
> handful of devs can accomplish in the long run. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> New docs on the other hand should be a better priority to start out with. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> > Anyways, I'd love to hear your feedback and opinions! |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> And I'd love to help with the docs:-) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Hello, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Could some point me to, or provide a more specific breakdown of some of the |
| 22 |
roles and tasks that would need to be tended to? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Forgive me if i appear ignorant to the problems and issues with maintaining an |
| 25 |
enterprise ready tree but in my mind running a stable tree would involve : |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
1. Identifiying a version of a package that is stable |
| 28 |
2. Marking that package as stable |
| 29 |
3. Pushing that package to the rsync servers |
| 30 |
4. ? |
| 31 |
5. ? |
| 32 |
6. ? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
What are the items that are missing from my list? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Cheers |
| 37 |
Phil |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Archives