Archives
Archives
| From: | Christian Spoo <mail@××××××××××××××.info> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-server@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-server] RAID5 vs. RAID0+1 | ||
| Date: | Sat, 07 Oct 2006 00:40:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4526F6C7.1020702@christian-spoo.info | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-server] RAID5 vs. RAID0+1 by kashani |
||
| 1 | > Assuming drives are $100 then it's the difference of $300 vs $400 which |
| 2 | > is a much better ratio than the shelf example. At this level going with |
| 3 | > better performance for that cost difference makes sense. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I totally agree since the 500GB are enough capacity to save at least the |
| 6 | work of half a year. Older things are backed up and removed from the |
| 7 | server. A whole rack would be real overkill, at least for us. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| mail.vcf | text/x-vcard |
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |