1 |
I've been waiting for the patched version of gaming-sources, but |
2 |
when I tried to emerge gamin-sources last night, I received a |
3 |
message stating that all of the ebuilds were masked. I assumed |
4 |
it was because they were in the process of being patched. |
5 |
Should I just emerge -u gaming-sources<explicit-version>? |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
--- Andy Dustman <adustman@×××××××××.edu> wrote: |
10 |
> On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 15:18, Kerin Millar wrote: |
11 |
> > Let me make it perfectly clear that every version of every |
12 |
> single set of |
13 |
> > kernel sources in ebuild now applies a patch to rectify the |
14 |
> > vulnerability, if required. Even vanilla-sources-2.4.20 is |
15 |
> now safe, for |
16 |
> > example. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Not all of the ebuilds have been bumped a revision number, so |
19 |
> you won't |
20 |
> get the patch with emerge --update world; you'll need to |
21 |
> explicitly |
22 |
> re-emerge. In particular, vanilla-sources were not bumped. |
23 |
> wolk-sources |
24 |
> were bumped (to 4.9-r2) within the last day (or moved to |
25 |
> stable), |
26 |
> although 4.9-r1 also has the patch. And I may be wrong but it |
27 |
> appears |
28 |
> redhat-sources does not have the fix unless it was previously |
29 |
> incorporated by Red Hat. (I don't use that package so I can't |
30 |
> say |
31 |
> authoritatively). |
32 |
> -- |
33 |
> Andy Dustman <adustman@×××××××××.edu> |
34 |
> Office of Information Technology, Terry College of Business, |
35 |
> UGA |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
===== |
40 |
-------- |
41 |
Dan Shookowsky |
42 |
shookow@×××××.com |
43 |
|
44 |
__________________________________ |
45 |
Do you Yahoo!? |
46 |
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now |
47 |
http://companion.yahoo.com/ |