1 |
Jose, |
2 |
I would suspect that the odds of Gentoo complying with either of these |
3 |
standards are slim to none as long as they define RPM as the mandatory |
4 |
package management format. |
5 |
|
6 |
Andy |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
--On Friday, November 19, 2004 18:05:53 +0100 Jose Gonzalez Gomez |
10 |
<jgonzalez@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
11 |
|
12 |
> |
13 |
> Hi there, |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I found today two new acronyms: LSB (Linux Standard Base)[1] and LCC |
16 |
> (Linux Core Consortium)[2] |
17 |
> |
18 |
> [1] http://www.linuxbase.org/ |
19 |
> [2] http://www.mandrakesoft.com/lcc/faq |
20 |
> |
21 |
> They seem to be interesting, as they intend to build on a common |
22 |
> base, specified in the linux standard base, so providers of commercial |
23 |
> software are able to certify their products on this platform, so any |
24 |
> distribution complying with it may get kind of automatically certified |
25 |
> (or something like that). I just wanted to mention here to hear your |
26 |
> opinions, and comment on the possibility / interest of Gentoo complying |
27 |
> with LSB. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Best regards |
30 |
> Jose |