Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Andrew Fant <andrew.fant@×××××.edu>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Linux Standard Base and Linux Core Consortium
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:11:36
Message-Id: 46740000.1100884291@flux.usg.tufts.edu
In Reply to: [gentoo-server] Linux Standard Base and Linux Core Consortium by Jose Gonzalez Gomez
1 Jose,
2 I would suspect that the odds of Gentoo complying with either of these
3 standards are slim to none as long as they define RPM as the mandatory
4 package management format.
5
6 Andy
7
8
9 --On Friday, November 19, 2004 18:05:53 +0100 Jose Gonzalez Gomez
10 <jgonzalez@×××××××××××.com> wrote:
11
12 >
13 > Hi there,
14 >
15 > I found today two new acronyms: LSB (Linux Standard Base)[1] and LCC
16 > (Linux Core Consortium)[2]
17 >
18 > [1] http://www.linuxbase.org/
19 > [2] http://www.mandrakesoft.com/lcc/faq
20 >
21 > They seem to be interesting, as they intend to build on a common
22 > base, specified in the linux standard base, so providers of commercial
23 > software are able to certify their products on this platform, so any
24 > distribution complying with it may get kind of automatically certified
25 > (or something like that). I just wanted to mention here to hear your
26 > opinions, and comment on the possibility / interest of Gentoo complying
27 > with LSB.
28 >
29 > Best regards
30 > Jose

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] Linux Standard Base and Linux Core Consortium Jose Gonzalez Gomez <jgonzalez@×××××××××××.com>