| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Oh yeah, it would also be really useful to know the status of your code. |
| 3 |
> Is it already integrated into Gentoo, what's the plans for integrating |
| 4 |
> it if not, etc. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Part of the code is integrated at Smolt upstream. |
| 7 |
The remaining part is planned to be merged upstream, too. |
| 8 |
Neither upstream nor I want a fork and if upstream resources can handle |
| 9 |
the extra Gentoo load we will just upgrade the instance running behind |
| 10 |
http://www.smolts.org/ and submit the Gentoo data to that, too. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I should mention that load is not to be neglected, both looking at |
| 13 |
processing time of a single submission as well as storage needs. I hope |
| 14 |
to further improve on the SQL alchemy logic used in my code to make |
| 15 |
submission handling faster. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If any SQL alchemy experts around feel like mentoring me through the |
| 18 |
process they are welcome to do so. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Anything else you want to know? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Sebastian |
Archives