1 |
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Sebastian |
2 |
Pipping<webmaster@××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
> Part of the code is integrated at Smolt upstream. |
4 |
> The remaining part is planned to be merged upstream, too. |
5 |
> Neither upstream nor I want a fork and if upstream resources can handle |
6 |
> the extra Gentoo load we will just upgrade the instance running behind |
7 |
> http://www.smolts.org/ and submit the Gentoo data to that, too. |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
If this is combined with some sort of gentoo-infra based backups of |
11 |
the data, it would be nice. |
12 |
|
13 |
> I should mention that load is not to be neglected, both looking at |
14 |
> processing time of a single submission as well as storage needs. I hope |
15 |
> to further improve on the SQL alchemy logic used in my code to make |
16 |
> submission handling faster. |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
You mentioned that upstream needs to check if they can handle Gentoo |
20 |
load, was this the bottleneck in that? |
21 |
|
22 |
> |
23 |
> Anything else you want to know? |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
I would say: Is there anything else *you* want to tell us? :) |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
30 |
|
31 |
GNOME+Mozilla Team, Gentoo |