| 1 |
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 2 |
> If this is combined with some sort of gentoo-infra based backups of |
| 3 |
> the data, it would be nice. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Any ideas how we could organize that? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> You mentioned that upstream needs to check if they can handle Gentoo |
| 9 |
> load, was this the bottleneck in that? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
As I understand load is quite high already (I think due to a high rate |
| 12 |
of submissions). The gentoo stuff adds to the per-submission processing |
| 13 |
time considerably: A machine with 500-1000 packages installed adds a |
| 14 |
few thousand DB rows easily. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I have introduced batch processing (..) but it may need to be taken |
| 17 |
further and it's not upstream yet. I'm positive about it, upstream is |
| 18 |
just a bit busy these days. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
>> Anything else you want to know? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I would say: Is there anything else *you* want to tell us? :) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
If I had a wish I'd say please update the running Redmine installation |
| 26 |
to a recent version (without killing the current data, please :-)). |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Also I'd really like to see more reviews, alchemy mentoring and |
| 29 |
contributions from others. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
There may be news on PackageMap again, too. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Sebastian |
Archives