From: | heroxbd@×××××.com | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-soc@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-soc] netifrc on systemd: Weekly Report #5 | ||
Date: | Sun, 22 Jun 2014 05:59:20 | ||
Message-Id: | 861tuhzdqo.fsf@moguhome00.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-soc] netifrc on systemd: Weekly Report #5 by Rabi Shanker Guha |
1 | Hey Rabi, |
2 | |
3 | Rabi Shanker Guha <guha.rabishankar@×××××.com> writes: |
4 | |
5 | > sudo systemctl restart net@eth0 |
6 | > sudo systemctl status net@eth0 |
7 | |
8 | Just curious how this naming scheme were formed. Intuitively, eth0 is a |
9 | subset of net, making "eth0@net" and "net.eth0" more natural. |
10 | |
11 | Benda |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-soc] netifrc on systemd: Weekly Report #5 | Rabi Shanker Guha <guha.rabishankar@×××××.com> |