| 1 |
Hi, Rich, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> writes: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:38 AM, <heroxbd@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> writes: |
| 7 |
>>> Were is it? I'd like to read it =) |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> And the "counter systemd" talk page, |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of_init_systems |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Just a comment on this - OpenRC is listed as having parallel startup |
| 16 |
> support, but I believe that this configuration is actually considered |
| 17 |
> unsupported on Gentoo even if the code is there. I believe even the |
| 18 |
> configuration options were removed from the config file to discourage |
| 19 |
> their user (though if somebody happens to know about the option they |
| 20 |
> can add it in and it will work. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> It is probably worth noting that this is an experimental feature in a |
| 23 |
> comparison. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks a lot for the comment. I agree. Nobody cares about the tiny (not |
| 26 |
tested) booting up time gain with rc_parallel. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
At present it is documented in rc.conf |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
,---- |
| 31 |
| # Set to "YES" if you want the rc system to try and start services |
| 32 |
| # in parallel for a slight speed improvement. When running in parallel |
| 33 |
| # we prefix the service output with its name as the output will get |
| 34 |
| # jumbled up. |
| 35 |
| # WARNING: whilst we have improved parallel, it can still potentially |
| 36 |
| # lock the boot process. Don't file bugs about this unless you can supply |
| 37 |
| # patches that fix it without breaking other things! |
| 38 |
| # rc_parallel="YES" |
| 39 |
`---- |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
I think it was "Parallel service startup - OpenRC - yes(buggy)" in wiki |
| 42 |
before. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Cheers, |
| 45 |
Benda |
Archives