Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] (draft) final report for OpenRC soc project 2012
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:12:57
Message-Id: CAGfcS_=0gPgWDH1zfkmUhW9t5k0vUGk0TMyUYQ-T0eTck8zJnQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] (draft) final report for OpenRC soc project 2012 by heroxbd@gmail.com
1 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:38 AM, <heroxbd@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> writes:
3 >> On 8/15/12 5:14 PM, heroxbd@×××××.com wrote:
4 >>> 2. A evaluation of existing init systems
5 >>>
6 >>> This includes solaris SMF, Mac OSX launchd, Fedora systemd, OpenSUSE
7 >>> systemd/LSB combo, Ubuntu upstart and Debian LSB/insserv combo.
8 >>
9 >> Were is it? I'd like to read it =)
10 >
11 > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems
12 >
13 > And the "counter systemd" talk page,
14 >
15 > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of_init_systems
16
17 Just a comment on this - OpenRC is listed as having parallel startup
18 support, but I believe that this configuration is actually considered
19 unsupported on Gentoo even if the code is there. I believe even the
20 configuration options were removed from the config file to discourage
21 their user (though if somebody happens to know about the option they
22 can add it in and it will work.
23
24 It is probably worth noting that this is an experimental feature in a
25 comparison.
26
27 Rich

Replies