| 1 |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Joachim Bartosik <jbartosik@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'd like to talk a little about Adapting Kuroo for current portage versions. |
| 3 |
> My biggest problem with the idea is that it has no contact, so I don't know |
| 4 |
> who should I ask about it. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> My questions right now are: "I have two very different ideas of doing that, |
| 7 |
> what do you think about them" (long description included so I'm not posting |
| 8 |
> it here) and ( the more important) "Does anyone really care if we have a |
| 9 |
> nice emerge GUI"). Do you know who should I talk to? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
We already have a number of "nice" emerge GUIs -- himerge, portato, |
| 13 |
porthole etc. You will want to talk to the nice folks on #gentoo-guis |
| 14 |
@ FreeNode. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If you want my opinion, I would suggest you try to see if some other |
| 17 |
gaps can be filled (whether in this area or otherwise) since portage |
| 18 |
GUIs seem to be aplenty. I am personally leaning towards the |
| 19 |
PackageKit backend as a point of attack. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
Archives