| 1 |
On 19:47 Fri 27 Mar , Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12:48 Fri 27 Mar , Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Andrey Kislyuk <weaver@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > I think the current fast boot focus on the various distros is horribly |
| 5 |
> > > misplaced. I couldn't care less whether my machines boot in 30 seconds |
| 6 |
> > > or 2 minutes. What I _really_ care about is that when I press the |
| 7 |
> > > button on my laptop, it wakes up from sleep in 2 seconds or less. |
| 8 |
> > > Linux is pretty bad at this. It's generally much worse than Windows, |
| 9 |
> > > which is in turn much worse than OS X. |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > So, if you really wish to make a difference in an area that others |
| 12 |
> > > haven't dealt with as much, try improving wake from sleep or hibernate |
| 13 |
> > > performance. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Different strokes for different folks, right? I never put my laptop to |
| 16 |
> > sleep so getting a fast boot time is important to me. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > What are some of your ideas for improving wake from sleep times? It |
| 19 |
> > would help those that have no idea where to even start on that topic |
| 20 |
> > as it is not as intuitive as fast boot times. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> The EeePC folks spent a lot of time on this. That's a good place to |
| 23 |
> start your research. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Sorry, I meant OLPC! |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Thanks, |
| 29 |
Donnie |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 32 |
Admin, Summer of Code |
| 33 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 34 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |
Archives