| 1 |
On 8/27/12 12:46 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/22/12 15:35, Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 8/22/12 4:04 AM, heroxbd@×××××.com wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Dear Luca, |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> writes: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> On 8/21/12 4:07 PM, heroxbd@×××××.com wrote: |
| 9 |
>>>>> For monitoring against OOM http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Monit |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>> So monit could be integrated in openrc easily ? |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> In the way of runit, yes. |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>>>> cron/at is too general to document, there is one at |
| 16 |
>>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/cron-guide.xml |
| 18 |
>>>> |
| 19 |
>>>> Agreed. |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>>> :) |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>>>>> upstart is designed to replace cron |
| 24 |
>>>>> |
| 25 |
>>>>> http://upstart.ubuntu.com/wiki/ReplaceCron |
| 26 |
>>>>> |
| 27 |
>>>>> systemd recommends to replace cron |
| 28 |
>>>>> |
| 29 |
>>>>> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Optimizations |
| 30 |
>>>>> |
| 31 |
>>>>> while OpenRC just work with it. For some fancy new feature to be |
| 32 |
>>>>> used on |
| 33 |
>>>>> non-servers, like "run every 5 minutes after start up", fcron can be |
| 34 |
>>>>> used. |
| 35 |
>>>> |
| 36 |
>>>> Not sure exactly what should we add here. |
| 37 |
>>> |
| 38 |
>>> The feature of cron-like feature in systemd is limited, while in upstart |
| 39 |
>>> they just replace cron for "cleanness" and integration. I don't think |
| 40 |
>>> there is a special task OpenRC/cron can't do. |
| 41 |
>>> |
| 42 |
>>>>> A stub page is below. Still thinking of how to present it. May be |
| 43 |
>>>>> we can |
| 44 |
>>>>> just load it with examples which covers all the cases upstart being |
| 45 |
>>>>> proud of. |
| 46 |
>>>>> |
| 47 |
>>>>> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/OpenRC/Event_Driven |
| 48 |
>>>> |
| 49 |
>>>> Yes, might be a good approach. |
| 50 |
>>> |
| 51 |
>>> New examples welcome ;) How would gentoo deal with udev is still |
| 52 |
>>> unclear, while I think we can document the present udev features. udev |
| 53 |
>>> merge with systemd is not a big threat, is it? |
| 54 |
>> |
| 55 |
>> Replacing udev-systemd with udev is probably yet another huge project, |
| 56 |
>> hopefully somebody would help. |
| 57 |
> We already have patches to fix things thanks to Polynomial-C aka. Lars |
| 58 |
> Wendler. See: |
| 59 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~polynomial-c/udev/ |
| 60 |
> |
| 61 |
> Now we only need to motivate our maintainers to use the openrc useflag |
| 62 |
> to fix udev properly. |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
Let's keep a fork call it edev and be done with that. |
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
Sounds fine? |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
lu |
Archives