1 |
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 18:27 +0900, Ryuichi KAWAMATA wrote: |
2 |
> Hello. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > As was noted in the wiki, this idea is too small for a complete project |
5 |
> > on it's own. You will need to add more to it in order for it to be |
6 |
> > considered. |
7 |
> I discussed this in gentoo-soc IRC yesterday. |
8 |
> And, I decide to add another idea, "To implement tags support for Portato" |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I know CUI system is very useful because it can use over ssh, and |
11 |
> normally it's lightly. |
12 |
> But, if we need a system which has much information, I think GUI |
13 |
> system is also good. |
14 |
> Therefore, I propose this idea. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I heard Portato developers are few too. |
17 |
> So, I think this idea can help its developing. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> My goal in this GSoC idea is that; |
20 |
> * To develop tags support for Portage |
21 |
> * To develop tags support for Portato |
22 |
> |
23 |
> If there are some strange points in my plan, would you point it? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Thanks! |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
The strange part, is that portato is behind in changes to portage, so it |
29 |
no longer works correctly. It has also been asked that we remove it |
30 |
from the tree (by it's creator) for that reason. Rather than that, we |
31 |
would prefer if it was brought up to date. Adding tags support to |
32 |
portato, porthole, or any of the other python based guis would be fairly |
33 |
easy once it was done in portage. I would think it would not take more |
34 |
than a couple days to add tags support to a gui once the code is in |
35 |
operation in portage. |
36 |
|
37 |
The best way to keep portato going is to update it's use of portage. |
38 |
One of the best ways to do that is to finish the new public_api and |
39 |
change portato to use it. It at the very least needs the current code |
40 |
updated to the current portage api. |
41 |
|
42 |
> |
43 |
> 2012/4/3 Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>: |
44 |
> > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 08:24 +0900, Ryuichi KAWAMATA wrote: |
45 |
> >> Hello, everybody! |
46 |
> >> |
47 |
> >> My name is Ryuichi KAKWAMATA, a Japanese student. |
48 |
> >> I'm a sophomore from April. |
49 |
> >> (Japanese school starts from April to March. :D) |
50 |
> >> I'm interesting in the idea "Tags support for Portage." |
51 |
> >> |
52 |
> >> I like portage because I think it's the cleverest package management system!! |
53 |
> >> So, I use it in OSX as Gentoo Prefix too. |
54 |
> >> |
55 |
> >> Now, there is a idea to improve so, I want to develop it very much. |
56 |
> >> I'm good at Python and C programming and knowledge about operating systems. |
57 |
> >> |
58 |
> >> I want to learn the OSS community and help it too. |
59 |
> >> |
60 |
> >> Thanks! |
61 |
> >> |
62 |
> > |
63 |
> > Thank you for your interest. |
64 |
> > |
65 |
> > As was noted in the wiki, this idea is too small for a complete project |
66 |
> > on it's own. You will need to add more to it in order for it to be |
67 |
> > considered. |
68 |
> > |
69 |
> > You might want to consider adding both eix and esearch to your proposal |
70 |
> > to add tags support to their fast search db's. I would be your contact |
71 |
> > for work done to esearch. Contact the upstream developer to discuss |
72 |
> > adding tags support to eix. |
73 |
> > |
74 |
> > That will still likely not be enough to make it a complete project, so |
75 |
> > you will need to come up with some additional work to do. Preferably in |
76 |
> > the same realm of work as the above, mostly portage. One idea I have |
77 |
> > would be to complete work on the portage public_api that was started but |
78 |
> > needs additional work to complete. That idea could fill in the project |
79 |
> > timeline. Contact me directly if you wish to discuss it further. |
80 |
> > -- |
81 |
> > Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |
82 |
> |
83 |
> |
84 |
> |
85 |
|
86 |
|
87 |
-- |
88 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |