| 1 |
On 06/20/2013 06:20 AM, heroxbd wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dear Luca, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> writes: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> The plan is fine, but if there is time left I'd like to focus on using |
| 7 |
>> clang as main compiler for prefix and use musl as prefix libc. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> The rationale for the first is to push a bit the boundary the second is |
| 10 |
>> because musl had been touted as a good match as side-libc for android |
| 11 |
>> since it is really compact yet posix functional. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I have digged through |
| 14 |
> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Clang and http://www.musl-libc.org. As I am |
| 15 |
> personally after a Gentoo/XWayland mobile device, I'd like to give |
| 16 |
> Prefix/libc on arm a higher priority than alternative cc/libc. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Sounds fine for me as priority =) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
lu |
Archives