1 |
On 06/19/2013 04:41 PM, heroxbd wrote: |
2 |
> Dear Guy and Gals, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Gentoo on Android is about running Gentoo natively on Android |
5 |
> devices[1], mentored by Luca. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I should have reported on 6.14, but I was thinking to finish before |
8 |
> reporting and couldn't stop. Apologies to this. I will watch against |
9 |
> this behavior pattern in the future. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Here comes to the summary. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I am ahead of fixed plan now: a usable Prefix/libc solution is |
14 |
> completed[2], and is just announced to attract more testers and |
15 |
> developers[3]. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Plan for 6.20 and 6.21: |
18 |
> |
19 |
> a. clear out the requirement of cross compile on Prefix and roll out |
20 |
> a GLEP draft. We are already gaining momentum on a |
21 |
> specification[4] in Prefix community. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> b. reflect more on gcc spec hack of toolchain, discussed today on |
24 |
> IRC gentoo-prefix with redlizard and Mr. (surprise!) |
25 |
> ABCD. Construct a toy system if time permitted. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> We have accumulated many kinds of wrappers that injects magic |
28 |
> command line oppotions in Gentoo Prefix, and Prefix/libc adds |
29 |
> even more. Things are getting more complex. By centering all |
30 |
> hacks into gcc specs would make an elegant solution, with a |
31 |
> by-product of merging {gcc,binutils}-config between Gentoo Prefix |
32 |
> and vanilla. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> An example of hacking gcc spec from LFS: |
35 |
> |
36 |
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/adjusting.html |
37 |
|
38 |
The plan is fine, but if there is time left I'd like to focus on using |
39 |
clang as main compiler for prefix and use musl as prefix libc. |
40 |
|
41 |
The rationale for the first is to push a bit the boundary the second is |
42 |
because musl had been touted as a good match as side-libc for android |
43 |
since it is really compact yet posix functional. |
44 |
|
45 |
lu |