| 1 |
* Sebastian Damm (2005-11-17 11:22 +0100) |
| 2 |
> Am 17. November 2005 schrieb Thorsten Kampe: |
| 3 |
>> Na dann solltest du deinem Provider mal klarmachen, dass Gmane nix mit |
| 4 |
>> Spam zu tun hat. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Mein "Provider" findet auch was. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) |
| 9 |
> X-Spam-Report: ---- Start des SpamAssassin-Reports (SA 3.0.3, Razor, DCC, Pyzor) |
| 10 |
> Fragen an/Questions to: postmaster@×××××.de |
| 11 |
> 0.1 RCVD_BY_IP Received by mail server with no name |
| 12 |
> -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record |
| 13 |
> 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO |
| 14 |
> -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% |
| 15 |
> [score: 0.0000] |
| 16 |
> ---- Ende des SpamAssassin-Reports |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Die numerischen HELOs sind aber eindeutig Gmane (oder dem |
| 19 |
> Provider) anzulasten, genauso wie die fehlende Rückwärtsauflösung. Das |
| 20 |
> sind so Sachen, die heutzutage immer häufiger vernachlässigt werden. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Was gibt's da zu vernachlaessigen? Beide Sachen sind absolut in |
| 23 |
Ordnung: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Der relevante RFC ist 2821 von April 2001: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
,--- * 4.1.1.1 Extended HELLO (EHLO) or HELLO (HELO) |
| 28 |
| These commands are used to identify the SMTP client to the SMTP |
| 29 |
| server. The argument field contains the fully-qualified domain name of |
| 30 |
| the SMTP client if one is available. In situations in which the SMTP |
| 31 |
| client system does not have a meaningful domain name (e.g., when its |
| 32 |
| address is dynamically allocated and no reverse mapping record is |
| 33 |
| available), the client SHOULD send an address literal (see section |
| 34 |
| 4.1.3) [...] |
| 35 |
`--- |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
,--- * 4.1.3 Address Literals |
| 38 |
| Sometimes a host is not known to the domain name system and |
| 39 |
| communication (and, in particular, communication to report and repair |
| 40 |
| the error) is blocked. To bypass this barrier a special literal form |
| 41 |
| of the address is allowed as an alternative to a domain name. For IPv4 |
| 42 |
| addresses, this form uses four small decimal integers separated by |
| 43 |
| dots and enclosed by brackets such as [123.255.37.2], which indicates |
| 44 |
| an (IPv4) Internet Address in sequence-of-octets form. |
| 45 |
`--- |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gentoo-user-de@g.o mailing list |
Archives