| 1 |
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 01:12:08 +0100 |
| 2 |
arrase <arrase@××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Bueno, he compilado mi nucleo para que se vea la diferencia de activar o |
| 5 |
> no la opcion High Memory Support con 1GB de ram, esta es la salida de |
| 6 |
> dmesg CON HMS ACTIVADO: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Linux version 2.6.17.13 (root@dante) (gcc versión 3.4.6 (Gentoo |
| 9 |
> 3.4.6-r1, ssp-3. |
| 10 |
> 4.5-1.0, pie-8.7.9)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Sep 12 22:25:34 CEST 2006 |
| 11 |
> .......... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> 127MB HIGHMEM available. |
| 14 |
> 896MB LOWMEM available. |
| 15 |
> ............ |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Y esta es la misma maquina con el mismo nucleo CON HMS DESACTIVADO: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Linux version 2.6.17.13-nohms (root@dante) (gcc versión 3.4.6 (Gentoo |
| 20 |
> 3.4.6-r1, ssp-3. |
| 21 |
> 4.5-1.0, pie-8.7.9)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Sep 12 22:35:14 CEST 2006 |
| 22 |
> .......... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> 896MB LOWMEM available. |
| 25 |
> ............ |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Saludos. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Gracias por la aclaración arrase, no había tenido ocasión de tocar un |
| 31 |
equipo con justo 1G de ram, pasé de 512K a 2M del tirón ;) ,me ha |
| 32 |
quedado muy claro :) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Saludos |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
> > Other than the fact Linux has a cool name, could someone explain why I |
| 40 |
> > should use Linux over BSD? |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> No. That's it. The cool name, that is. We worked very hard on |
| 43 |
> creating a name that would appeal to the majority of people, and it |
| 44 |
> certainly paid off: thousands of people are using linux just to be able |
| 45 |
> to say "OS/2? Hah. I've got Linux. What a cool name". 386BSD made the |
| 46 |
> mistake of putting a lot of numbers and weird abbreviations into the |
| 47 |
> name, and is scaring away a lot of people just because it sounds too |
| 48 |
> technical. |
| 49 |
-- Linus Torvalds' follow-up to a question about Linux |
Archives