Archives
Archives
| From: | Steven Lembark <lembark@×××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | lembark@×××××××.com | ||
| Subject: | Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:27:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20200423152716.51799a42.lembark@wrkhors.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? by lego12239@yandex.ru | ||
| 1 | > portage must be in C and statically linked. |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Seems to argue in favor of a statically-linked dynamic language: The |
| 4 | runtime compiler can be static with install scripts being a bit more |
| 5 | malleable. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Main issue I can see with C is that most people today don't know how |
| 8 | to manage memory; not enough of us left who really understand how |
| 9 | malloc works :-) |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Steven Lembark 5725 Aylesboro Ave |
| 13 | Workhorse Computing Pittsburgh PA 15217 |
| 14 | lembark@×××××××.com +1 888 359 3508 |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | lego12239@××××××.ru |
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | Caveman Al Toraboran <toraboracaveman@××××××××××.com> |