Archives
Archives
| From: | lego12239@××××××.ru | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:13:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20200422161455.GA23147@legohost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? by Caveman Al Toraboran |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 04:07:52PM +0000, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote: |
| 2 | > in fact, i think portage sucks so much it must be |
| 3 | > rewritten from scratch, in such a way that it has |
| 4 | > least run-time dependencies, so we stop worrying |
| 5 | > about upgrading other packages, such as python. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Yes. And yes again :-). +1 |
| 8 | portage must be in C and statically linked. |
| 9 | python is a strange dependency. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | Alessandro Barbieri <lssndrbarbieri@×××××.com> |
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | Steven Lembark <lembark@×××××××.com> |
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> |