| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:46 on Monday 30 May 2011, Mick did opine |
| 2 |
thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> e17 is the best desktop for me, because it is extremely light footed, has |
| 5 |
> enough eye candy (if you need that) and it is relatively |
| 6 |
> configurable. Until it becomes stable you'll need to compile it from |
| 7 |
> svn. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Alan, I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "huge mind shift"? Unless |
| 10 |
> my mind shifted and wasn't aware of it! :)) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I meant that for someone using e17 for the very first time they will find |
| 13 |
something quite unfamiliar. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
They'll also need to get into raster's head to some degree too :-) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives