| 1 |
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 14:45:47 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 13:46 on Monday 30 May 2011, Mick did opine |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> thusly: |
| 5 |
> > e17 is the best desktop for me, because it is extremely light footed, has |
| 6 |
> > enough eye candy (if you need that) and it is relatively |
| 7 |
> > configurable. Until it becomes stable you'll need to compile it from |
| 8 |
> > svn. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Alan, I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "huge mind shift"? |
| 11 |
> > Unless my mind shifted and wasn't aware of it! :)) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I meant that for someone using e17 for the very first time they will find |
| 14 |
> something quite unfamiliar. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I know what you're mean! I am still looking at the advanced Fonts config menu |
| 17 |
waiting for inspiration ... one day I hope it will make sense how that GUI is |
| 18 |
meant to work. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> They'll also need to get into raster's head to some degree too :-) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
:-) |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Mick |
Archives