1 |
Heiko Nock wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 09:46:41PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>> I've just read your outdated page |
5 |
>> It is not outdated. Since more than a year, there is no visible development |
6 |
>> in cdrkit. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Not visible to you. cdrkit-1.1.8 at http://cdrkit.org/releases/ is |
9 |
> dated 25.05.2008. It would be prudent for them to bring their website |
10 |
> up-to-date, though. |
11 |
> |
12 |
>> So I asume that they did not add new bugs. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Maybe you should assume less and research more. |
15 |
> |
16 |
>>> <http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html>. Where you |
17 |
>>> listed specific bugs, I see they don't affect me (and can't imagine |
18 |
>>> they'd affect most users). Most of what you cite as bugs are just |
19 |
>>> features they haven't implemented yet (and for all I know, they |
20 |
>>> have since you wrote that page). |
21 |
>> This is obviously FUD: Just because you don't already know that you |
22 |
>> are affected does not mean that you are not affected. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Of course not. Even the linux-kernel mailing-list hasn't seen your |
25 |
> light, yet. |
26 |
> |
27 |
>> It would be fun to see you in 5 years after your then current OS |
28 |
>> won't read your DVDs anymore because of the bugs in the filesystem |
29 |
>> structure. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> It would be fun if you would finally stop trolling forums, newsgroups |
32 |
> and mailing-lists and keep your FUD and ego problems to yourself. You |
33 |
> obviously take it as a personal insult that cdrtools was snubbed by |
34 |
> some distributions and that somebody else is working on a replacement. |
35 |
> Your constant ridicule and insults of a project you shouldn't care |
36 |
> about at all is very telling, considering the alleged superiority of |
37 |
> your own project. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Thankfully, the GPL allows forks to eventually get rid of project |
40 |
> leaders like you. |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
I think it would be in everyone's best interests if we let this thread |
44 |
die now, I've been reading this thread for the past 2 or 3 days and |
45 |
frankly, it doesn't seem to be bringing anything of use to the ML. |
46 |
|
47 |
I don't want to get involved or takes anyone's side, but maybe the more |
48 |
mature readers can just let it go :) I doubt anyone will miss any |
49 |
benefit of this thread continuing. |
50 |
|
51 |
Just want to help keep this list with its feet on the ground :) |
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
Matt |
55 |
-- |
56 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |