Archives
Archives
| From: | Consus <consus@××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:24:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20200422182435.GI187193@redacted | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? by Michael Orlitzky |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 02:19:19PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 | > How do you plan to update all of your programs when there's a security |
| 3 | > vulnerability in, say, OpenSSL? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | emerge -1 @world of course :D |
| 6 | |
| 7 | By the way, Rust does support dynamic linking (to a degree), but does |
| 8 | not have (yet, I pray) stable ABI. So what's current Gentoo team |
| 9 | consensus on security updates? Will there be Cargo.lock metadata that |
| 10 | will allows portage to automatically rebuild against newer library |
| 11 | versions? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |