Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:19:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | f67a1600-3c4f-fcf5-249c-490857faaf48@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? by lego12239@yandex.ru | ||
| 1 | On 4/22/20 2:08 PM, lego12239@××××××.ru wrote: |
| 2 | > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Alessandro Barbieri wrote: |
| 3 | >> Whatever, but QA is by my side and I'm helping removing static libraries |
| 4 | >> from gentoo packages. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Man, this is not a technical argument. Sorry :-). You are wrong from a |
| 7 | > technical point of view. And the fact above says just: |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > - some packages really need not this |
| 10 | > - or QA not competent in this question just like you |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | |
| 13 | How do you plan to update all of your programs when there's a security |
| 14 | vulnerability in, say, OpenSSL? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | Michael Jones <gentoo@×××××××.com> |
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | Consus <consus@××××.net> |
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | lego12239@××××××.ru |