Archives
Archives
| From: | lego12239@××××××.ru | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:07:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20200422180825.GA12885@legohost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? by Alessandro Barbieri |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Alessandro Barbieri wrote: |
| 2 | > Whatever, but QA is by my side and I'm helping removing static libraries |
| 3 | > from gentoo packages. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Man, this is not a technical argument. Sorry :-). You are wrong from a |
| 6 | technical point of view. And the fact above says just: |
| 7 | |
| 8 | - some packages really need not this |
| 9 | - or QA not competent in this question just like you |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |