1 |
Paul Hartman wrote: |
2 |
> When you say "memtest" what memtest are you using, exactly? The one |
3 |
> from the kernel? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I prefer memtest86+ as it is updated and has support for the latest |
6 |
> CPUs and memory configurations. You can install it from portage and |
7 |
> add an entry to your Grub menu and don't need to mess with bootable CD |
8 |
> or USB or anything like that. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> You can test specific ranges, if you suspect the new RAM is causing |
11 |
> trouble. Full memory testing of all patterns with 16 gigs of RAM can |
12 |
> take forever, but in my experience tests 5 and 8 in memtest86+ are |
13 |
> typically the only tests that actually produce errors on modern |
14 |
> systems. If you're in a hurry you can just run test 5 and that'll give |
15 |
> you many more passes in a shorter time. I would at least want to run |
16 |
> this kind of test for 12 hours with no errors before trusting the |
17 |
> machine. 24 or 48 hours if you can afford the wait. :) |
18 |
> |
19 |
> If it does not always recognize the full 16GB i would suspect you need |
20 |
> to increase the voltage to your RAM. You may also (or instead) need to |
21 |
> reduce the memory speed. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> On my previous motherboard, an Abit, with Patriot DDR2 RAM, it could |
24 |
> handle 4GB of RAM (2x2GB) no problems, running at recommended voltage |
25 |
> and full speed. When I doubled that to 8GB (4x2GB) it crashed often, |
26 |
> but not constantly. It could not pass an overnight memory test. I |
27 |
> ultimately had to raise the voltage by 0.3 and reduce the speed from |
28 |
> 800MHz to 667MHz. I ran memtest86+ for 3 days and it had no errors. |
29 |
> After that it worked like a champ for 2 years, no problems. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Also, if you're using DDR3 which contains XMP data (timing and voltage |
32 |
> presets, basically) beware that it can sometimes be wrong. I have used |
33 |
> 2 different brands of RAM whose XMP data did not match the values |
34 |
> printed on the packaging. The manufacturers both times suggested I use |
35 |
> what's printed on the packaging and ignore what the chip itself tells |
36 |
> me. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> And of course on my recent Core i7 920 build, I spent a month trying |
39 |
> to get OCZ Gold RAM to work properly with my Gigabyte motherboard. |
40 |
> After 2 DOA sticks exchanged and a month of trying everything I could |
41 |
> possibly think of it still failed memory tests (sometimes it would |
42 |
> only fail after 5 or 6 hours of testing) and I gave up and returned it |
43 |
> to the store for a refund. I ordered some Corsair XMS3 RAM online |
44 |
> instead, it worked right away with the recommended settings, no |
45 |
> messing around, and I've been running happily ever after. :) |
46 |
> |
47 |
|
48 |
I figured out why it appeared not to be testing it all. I was just |
49 |
checking it as I walked by and such and I guess it just happened to be |
50 |
testing the first 2Gbs or so each time I walked by. I did another test |
51 |
and just sat and watched a lot of it. It appears to be testing in 2Gb |
52 |
chunks or something. It would test something to 2Gbs, then test 2Gbs to |
53 |
4Gbs and so on. So, it was testing it all, I was just not there to see |
54 |
it do it. The something in the first 2Gbs is what it needs to load the |
55 |
test I guess. It was just a small amount tho. |
56 |
|
57 |
Mine is G Skill ram. It calls for at least 1333 but I got 1600. I |
58 |
usually get a little faster, in case I want to overclock a little but it |
59 |
also allows for a ram that may not be quite up to speed. Plus, it was |
60 |
on sale and was actually cheaper than 1333. lol That made the sale. |
61 |
;-) It is DDR3 tho. It is also in ganged mode too. It is faster that |
62 |
way. |
63 |
|
64 |
I hope I don't have to swap my ram. I bought it at newegg and the |
65 |
shipping would be fun I'm sure. At least I got plenty to run off of |
66 |
while swapping tho. |
67 |
|
68 |
Thanks. |
69 |
|
70 |
Dale |
71 |
|
72 |
:-) :-) |